Funding Climate Solutions for Chronic Flooding, Extreme Rainfall Events, and Water Quality with Stormwater Authorities
- Shared screen with speaker view

25:09
There are 121 put of 169 municipalities currently registered under the MS4 permit! Crazy!!

30:49
In New London, the state technically controls many roads that pass through town, including I-95, and the city maintains a number of parking lots. That's a lot of stormwater that goes directly into the Thames River. Do the city and state pay their fair share, too?

32:03
What if a property does not discharge stormwater i.e. drywells, infiltration basins, etc. Is there any exemption for them?

32:54
There needs to be a compensation mechanism established for those who responsibly capture their own stormwater and get it back into the ground via rain gardens, etc.

32:58
What about driveways and parking areas? Is this a good incentive to use pervious pavements?

33:56
There need to be incentives to do the right thing.

34:01
I’ve heard about city where property owners get credits for having healthy tree canopy. (with assessments made by the city arborist)

34:13
And how about properties that have plantings versus those that are mostly lawn? They have different impacts on stormwater capturing

34:20
credits to reduce their stormwater fee from trees

36:48
Isn't the real reason for MS4 to get stormwater into the ground instead of running across impervious surfaces into public water bodies and polluting them?

37:14
It's about pre-development hydrology, no?

38:14
You mentioned New London has tax exempt property with a significant % of impervious cover, such as state owned property, colleges and hospitals. Do they pay Stormwater fees or are they exempt?

38:31
Non-profits pay too

38:53
yup, I think nonprofits pay equally as everybody else

39:14
Really impressive Joe! Great work!

39:46
Great presentation Joe. Thank you

40:27
thank you for all the questions coming through the chat. we will do a facilitated Q&A at the end. Joe will be back to answer questions.

40:50
So do these fees go to Public Works?

41:20
The fees go to the stormwater authority in a designated fund

42:28
So, is this the water treatment authority for your town?

44:38
Ok. Getting my answer now. Thank you

48:06
All great points, Louanne. Sounds like a no-brainer!

51:03
Confused as to how towns keep actions / responsibilities of Stormwater Authority separate from actions / responsibilities of Flood Prevention, Climate Resilience and Erosion Control Board. Seems there is a lot of overlap.

51:10
https://resilientconnecticut.uconn.edu/fact-sheets/

52:14
Would municipalities still be eligible for these grants, even if they don't have a stormwater authority?

55:53
how would this program work with state owned lands, roads and facilities and where storm drainage is managed by the state?

56:09
https://circa.uconn.edu/funds-muni-2/

57:56
http://clear.uconn.edu

58:09
Yes, municipalities who don't have a stormwater authority can apply for a Municipal Resilience Grant. The goal of the Track 1 funding is to help municipalities implement a stormwater authority where they don't yet exist.

01:04:22
We can stay a few minutes past 1pm to get to more questions.

01:05:57
New London has no incentives for such projects thus far

01:06:40
There seems to be no credit/incentive system in New London. Will we have regulations enacted that control additional impervious surface creation and incentivize the removal of impervious surfaces and installation of infiltration systems?

01:06:45
Thank you! Informative talks!

01:07:16
Excellent presentations, very informative and motivating!

01:07:29
Where will the recording be available? Thanks for this talk

01:07:34
How do we find out where the existing authorities exist in CT?

01:12:47
Thanks all, great presentations!

01:14:06
Thank you for the substantive, clear, presentations. Great update on this topic.

01:14:53
At this time, CT has only ONE Stormwater authority, in New London

01:15:34
This was really great! Enabling and promoting the option of stormwater authorites/utilities was a near-term recommendation of the Rivers Sub Working Group of the GC3. Thanks DEEP and UCONN for really moving this forward and providing such great resources!

01:16:04
Thank you Alicea for the hard work leading the Rivers sub working group!

01:17:48
This was so great, thank to everyone for putting this together!

01:18:12
Can other established "Boards and Commissions" of a Town be charged with additional SA duties or does it have to be a unique entity?

01:19:43
I have to hop off, but thank you so much everyone!

01:20:24
Thank you for the great program/presentations!

01:20:25
Excellent presentations and discussion - thank you all!

01:20:45
Thank you all very much!

01:21:09
Joe L. is your best salesman! Thank you for a great webinar -